Sunday, December 18, 2011

On The Verge Of Transition In Syria.

Contributed by Naser Danan, M.D.

Keynote address delivered on Nov. 19.2011 in Detroit, Michigan at a conference titled "On the Verge of Transition" hosted by "Syrian Expatriates".

It's my great honor and privilege to be addressing such esteemed and distinguished Patriotic Syrians today gathered in the spirit and hopes of cooperation to assist in the resurrection of our long oppressed and long restrained and wounded Syria and its great Syrian People.

Liberty and dignity are two values by which our human family stands apart, and without which our sense of humanness is diminished and compromised.

Having experienced growing up in Syria under the watchful eye of a police state and a totalitarian despotic regime that robs its citizens from both, I -like many of you- was determined to seeking them elsewhere.

However, our Syrian people have recently asserted their demand to restore their long robbed God given human and citizen rights through their peaceful grassroots Revolution. Their struggle thus far has been rife with bloodshed and sacrifice. Their determination has astounded all near and far and earned them praise and respect. They have reasserted the notion that human spirit may temporarily be defeated but it can never be permanently subjugated. The path has so far proven tortuous but the Will unyielding.

We are a diverse nation and our diversity speaks not only of our tolerance but our acceptance and celebration of our diversity. Our land had been in the business of producing civilizations for thousands of years, as well as providing refuge to the oppressed from around the World, from Armenia to Kurdistan, to Circassia.

A chain is as strong as its weakest link so are nations. Therefore let us harness this diversity to strengthen each piece of our mosaic in the face of tyranny as we have in years past, and remember, in our diversity lies strength and in our division lies strength for our enemy. Let us continue this tradition and celebrate our differences.

Our Revolution is not a revolution of bread but a revolution of dignity, a revolution of liberty, a revolution of equality and equity and a revolution of pride.

Our revolution is against tyranny, against despotism, against nepotism but above all; against our past failures that facilitated the subjugation of an entire nation to the Will of few.

In short, it's a revolution against all that hinders the spirit of any citizen from soaring high.

Many concerned free Syrians both in Syria and abroad have chosen to rise up and speak out in support of their Syrian People's struggle, risking much but in return aspiring to achieve what was unimaginable a mere generation ago.

We are such free Syrians among many. Let us aspire to a free Syria in which the rule of Law prevails. Liberty, dignity, justice, equality and equal opportunity, freedom of speech and expression are but few of the universally shared values we shall seek to restore. Civil, pluralistic and constitutionally democratic. We shall envision a Syria for all Syrians constrained by nothing less than the limitless human ingenuity and imagination.

Naser Danan, a Pediatrician from Cleveland Ohio, activist in civil rights and social justice, serves on the Cleveland Leadership Council of the ACLU, Syrian Expatriates advisory board, National Consensus Movement executive committee member

Monday, October 24, 2011

The Government and the Opposition.

Contributed by Dima Moussa. Originally written for, and published in Syrian Hurriyat Magazine.

Months passed, between divisions and disagreements, before the Syrian Opposition met in Istanbul. Despite its political and ideological differences, it has finally decided to join ranks under the banner of the Syrian National Council (SNC). However, the Opposition did not easily arrive at this stage, or without any obstacles. During the period leading up to the formation of the SNC, many in Syria and abroad, wondered in disbelief about the position of the Syrian Opposition after nearly seven months since the beginning of the Revolution; this peaceful Revolution of the Syrian people who amazed the world and received its admiration with their epic resilience against one of the most oppressive and brutal regimes in modern history. 

For months, the Opposition could not unite and assume its duties as a leader of the Revolutionaries. It also did not attempt to gain recognition and legitimacy for the popular movement, to prepare for the stage after the regime is toppled. This weakness and division resulted in disappointment among many of the Revolutionaries, which pushed them to depend more on the Local Coordinating Committees (which have done a great job). As for the reluctant ones, the skeptics, and opponents of the Revolution – they downplayed the importance of the Revolution and its ability to achieve any change. Meanwhile, foreign countries used the absence of a defined Opposition with clear characteristics and goals as an excuse to not provide enough support and international protection to the Revolution in facing the criminal regime, which uses the ugliest suppression and torture against its own people.

So what is the behind the Opposition’s inability to overlook its differences and unite its ranks for more than six months? This is all despite the fact that the Opposition agrees on the main goal, and that is to overthrow the tyrannical Ba’athist regime and establish a free, democratic state. At the same time, we find that opposition in democratic states are able to overthrow the government merely by convincing the people that the government is not fit to continue leading the nation due to mistakes it makes when it exercises its leadership functions. In those nations, responsibilities are divided between the government and the opposition, where the government controls internal and foreign affairs, while the opposition monitors the government’s performance and confronts it when issues must be addressed or fixed within a framework of councils and organizations whose members are freely elected and democratically by the citizens. The national army, in these democratic nations, works under the guidance of and in cooperation with the government to protect the country from external invasions and defending it if needed, without getting involved in politics. As for keeping peace and ensuring safety of its citizens, that is the duty of the internal state security that also deals with demonstrations and protests, where the only weapons it uses are a helmet, a shield, and a rubber baton – to be used only for self-defense.

As for authoritarian regimes, a small group that is not elected by citizens reaches the government using tricks and devious ways, and is able to remain in power by using a security apparatus to manage state and internal affairs. As for the army, it becomes politicized and part of the government, and its main role is to protect the legitimacy of the government, rather than protecting the country. Additionally, the preference is for hypocrites and opportunists to conduct affairs of the state, and the standard for assessing citizenship becomes the degree of loyalty rather than the performance. 

As a result, corruption and favoritism spread, and the principle of equal opportunity is eliminated. The freedom of the majority of the honest citizens is suppressed, their dignity is wasted, and their economic and social conditions worsen, until their only interest is limited to making a living with the least amount of insult and humiliation. All this, with citizens having no right to complain, protest, or criticize. This leaves no room for any kind of opposition, whether political or individual, and if there happens to be opposition, their destiny is oppression or fabricating charges and throwing them in jail if they cannot escape the country. Therefore, the opposition figures are generally divided and unable to unite its ranks, positions, and efforts, and opposition figures are unable to trust one another because some may become weak and start cooperating with the government by belonging to a framework of formal democracy that is void of any power to real effectiveness. One such example is the People’s Representatives Council. In other situations, the opposition may form several opportunistic parties under the lead of the government’s party, and the only purpose of these councils and organizations is to beautify the ugly face of the regime.

What is happening Syria now is the result of the submission of the Syrian people to this kind of an oppressive regime for more than 40 years. Then conditions worsened to the point that protest movements started appearing here and there, and got repressed by the regime. But as soon as these movements became greater and reached the point of a revolution against the regime, the regime dropped its mask and its ugly face emerged, with the result being the massacre in Hama. When the republican regime was embarrassingly inherited like a monarchy, many people were optimistic, because this newcomer had a good reputation for openness, democracy, and liberalism. Everyone was waiting for the great reforms he promised. Damascus then had a calm spring, but it was very short-lived, when again it woke up to find the autumn of the previous regime coming back again to take the same repressive approach. All opposition figured were chased, regardless of their leanings, and any chance to form internal opposition was crushed, and because of fear for their families from revenge by the government, the opposition figures’ efforts to form true opposition outside were also crushed. 

When conditions became bad to the point where the people could not take it anymore, protesting masses took to the streets, being affected by the spring of change in the region, and called for its minimum rights, freedoms, and dignity. The response of the government then came, not expecting the people to dare pierce through the wall of fear and get out of its control. The regime depended on the security solution from Day One, and tried to repress the protests in a brutal manner using state security forces supported by tanks. As a result, many martyrs fell, a large number of protesters were arrested, and the result was the increased persistence of the protestors in asking for their demands. The circle of protests spread until it included all Syrian cities and villages, and with that increased the repressive, arrest, and torture measures. The chants and slogans of the protestors went from demanding reforms to nothing less than overthrowing the regime.

All these people are waiting for is that some of the opposition figures put behind them their old hatred and ideological, organizational, and national disputes, and to put off such disputes until after the regime is overthrown. What the opposition needs to do now is to form what can be formed as a legitimate representative of all revolutionaries, and to have the young leaders inside participate. However, because of the above-mentioned disputes, this opposition appeared divided and awkward, and needed several attempts that may have lasted longer than necessary to unite its ranks. Now, it seems that the opposition figures have overcome their differences and are ready to work together within the framework of the SNC. Our hope is that the SNC is able to reach the level of international recognition so it can relay the voice of the people, their demands, and the Revolution’s goals to the rest of the world, and thus secure international support for the Syrian people. If that happens, this will be the beginning of the end for this criminal regime, and we may witness in a future Syria reconciliation between the opposition and the government, where each side does its part in building Syria, without shedding blood or forcing opposition figures to organize their ranks in exile.

Dima Moussa is a Syrian-American attorney and member of the Syrian National Council (SNC). She can be contacted here.

The views identified in this op-ed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of NAFS.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Foreign Military Intervention. Why this is not an option for Syria.


Contributed by Sarab Al-Jijakli

As the Syrian revolution enters its 7th month, the perceived success of the NATO military intervention in Libya is gaining momentum among some Syrian opposition circles as a desirable approach to combat the escalation of Assad regime brutality.

This argument however, doesn’t account for the unique differences between the two nations and the realities of foreign interests.

The revolution must and will stay purely a Syrian-driven one, and here are a few points why:

1.    The oil factor

Libya's oil reserves are the largest in Africa and 9th largest in the world. Syria, while utilizing its oil to generate up to 30% of the State’s budget, is not a major oil producer by Middle Eastern standards.


Oil has been, and continues to be, the major influencer that drives western powers to intervene in the Arab world. As we have seen repeatedly over the past 50 years, influence over the production and distribution of oil resources dictates western policy in the area.

Oil is one of the key reasons why western powers were so willing and eager, to push for military intervention in Libya, while turning a blind eye to similar human catastrophes in Syria, Yemen, and even Bahrain.

There is also a practical element to this; the presence of oil ensures that there is a means to pay the bills for the cost of military intervention.

2.    A ‘readied’ opposition

Within weeks of the outbreak of pro-democracy demonstrations in Libya, a national transitional council was formed. We have learned that this was not coincidental. Additionally, senior military figures along with disgruntled influencers in Libya had been coordinating with NATO powers to ensure an alternative to Qaddafi’s regime, and were readied in Benghazi. This is not to say that the revolution was compromised or triggered by these elements. Far from it. Rather, they were ready to step in shortly after the Libyan people began demanding change.

The Syrian case is very different and as we have seen, the diverse opposition has been anything but ready. Unlike Libya, there will not be one entity to represent the revolution. Rather, there are networks of individuals representing outside opposition elements, local revolutionary committees, and the traditional ‘banned’ parties inside Syria.

This does not give the Western powers the confidence that any ‘partners’ they empower will ensure their interests are implementable once Assad falls.

3.    No Fly Zones & ‘boots on the ground’

Many have called for a no fly zone (NFZ) to protect Syrian protestors. It is easy to ask for a NFZ, but this assumes that world powers can muster the political support to implement one (they cannot). 
An NFZ essentially requires a state of war to effectively destroy air defense systems along with intelligence coordination on the ground to guide such attacks.

Assad’s air force has not so far been a major repressive force against the protestors, and while some have suggested an NFZ would deter regime security forces from traveling from city to city, it is highly unlikely, that NATO would engage in a ground war, when there are no military partners on the ground.
Such factors were present in Libya. Elements of the Libyan military defected early on in the uprising, therefore ensuring a coordinated response. Syria does not have this. While there have been desertions across the conscript army, there have not been any mass desertions that can amount to a substantial force.

Additionally, as with ‘intervention’ in other Arab nations, there would be a major concern that NATO would destroy the infrastructure in Syria. Without the oil revenue to rebuild, however, this would severely stunt Syria’s post-Assad recovery.

4.    The People's revolution

To date, the protest movement has effectively held to three key pillars:
  • Peaceful revolution – "no" to violent resistance
  • The Syrian people are ONE – "no" to sectarianism
  • This is a Syrian people’s revolution – "no" to foreign military intervention
The Syrian people have shown tremendous courage and discipline in keeping the protest movement peaceful to date. This has served to show the world the principled aims of the revolution, but has also been pragmatic, as there has been no homegrown military response as there was in Libya.

This being said, Syrians have the right, in the face of such brutality, to confront the regime with armed resistance.

To introduce foreign military intervention, however, will take the Syrian people out of the driver's seat and cause a further disconnect among Syrians: splitting the support for the revolution and even galvanizing many to defend the nation on the side of the regime against outsiders.

Moving forward.

While not a military one, there is a role to play for the Western and other international powers – namely, a humanitarian role (aid and international observers to act as shields for protesters), and a role in the form of diplomatic, economic, and political isolation of the regime to ensure that the Syrian people can themselves finish the job.

Furthermore, it is abundantly clear that Western nations will not intervene militarily, because such an intervention does not align with their interests. With this in mind, those figures in the Syrian opposition who call for foreign military intervention, should take heed and stop asking for it. It is reactionary and short-sighted to do so.

It is quite possible that the nature of the revolution may change from a peaceful one to an armed resistance. However, it must be made clear that the Syrian people themselves will deliver freedom to their nation – it won’t come on the wings of the West.

Sarab Al-Jijakli is a long-time activist within the Arab-American community and co-founded  NAAP-NY. He is also a founding member of The National Alliance for Syria. Contact him at @sarabny

The views identified in this op-ed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of NAFS.

Saturday, September 17, 2011

6 Months into the revolution

6 months into the revolution in Syria, we stand with our brothers & sisters who have shown tremendous courage, resilience & strength in the face of shocking brutality.

Regardless of our location, background or connections we will do everything in our reach to support the revolutions goals of toppling this brutal regime. 
We will continue to:
  • Provide to the Syrian diasporas a national framework for collective action
  • Connect all individuals, organizations and networks working towards a free and democratic Syria
  • Act as a mouthpiece for the democratic aspirations of those within Syria
Through our work, we will focus on achieving these 3 goals:
  • Mobilizing the Community
  • Raising awareness
  • Creating Influence
Get involved as each of you have a role to play. Visit http://www.allianceforsyria.org/Ways_to_Get_Involved.html
There is only one way forward - the revolution must & will succeed.

Long live a free Syria!

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Syria Talking Points


32 Questions on Syria!

With all the misinformation the regime continues to propagate, it is key to ensure we are communicating effectively the reality of what is happening in Syria. Please utilize the following talking points in your discussions, debates and outreach
.


If you have any input, questions, references you'd like to add please share!

1 - What’s going on in Syria?

Since March 2011, inspired by uprisings across the Arab world, millions of Syrians have taken to the streets to peacefully demand the end of Bashar al-Assad’s brutal regime and a change to a democratic form of government.

2 - What was the trigger for the protests?

Triggered by the torture of children who, inspired by revolutions in Tunisia & Egypt, sprayed anti-regime graffiti in the southern Syrian city of Daraa, what began as provincial grievances against corruption, nepotism, and human rights abuses has now reached a tipping point, with large segments of the Syrian population supporting change – there are major protests in every city, every day.

3 - How has the Assad regime responded?

The Assad regime’s response to the peaceful pro-democracy demands has been terrible and violent. As of mid-August 2011:
  • The United Nations has conservatively reported that more than 2,200 civilians have been murdered, including hundreds of children 
  • More than 350 Syrian soldiers have been killed by the regime for disobeying orders to shoot unarmed protesters 
  • More than 3,000 civilians have disappeared
  • Approximately 50,000 persons have been detained. They face torture and, in many cases, death
  • More than 15,000 people have become externally-displaced refugees in Turkey, Lebanon, and Jordan 
  • There are tens of thousands of internally-displaced civilians
4 - What are the Syrian people demanding?

Political platforms are evolving with a focus on developing a nation free from sectarian privileges and that represents all Syrians equally.

Since March 2011, protestors have been calling for the fall of the Assad regime and have rejected the regime's disingenuous announcements of so-called reforms. There is no room for dialogue with the regime – there is no going back, as too many lives have been shattered and the regime has lost credibility and any opportunity to deliver substantive, meaningful reforms.

The protest movement has held three key pillars to date:
  • This is a peaceful revolution – no to violent resistance 
  • The Syrian people are ONE – no to sectarianism 
  • This is a Syrian people’s revolution – no to foreign military intervention
5 - But wasn’t Bashar elected by the people?

Assad “inherited” Syria in July 2000 after the death of his father Hafez Al-Assad, who ruled Syria as a police state for 30 years. At the age of 34, Bashar al-Assad, an ophthalmologist who studied in England, was thrust into power through the regime’s nomination. His election was rubberstamped by a referendum vote of over 97% (according to government statistics), but he was the only candidate on the ballot.

Interestingly, the Syrian constitution’s age requirement for President was changed within hours, from 40 to 34, to allow this nomination. Does this sound like Bashar al-Assad was freely elected?

6 - But doesn't Bashar al-Assad need time to reform the country?

This regime had 11 years to deliver reforms, yet provided only symbolic reforms until street demonstrations started in March 2011. In fact, even the little relaxation of the police state that occurred after Bashar al-Assad’s “inheritance” of the throne (in a republic) was followed by serious repression, imprisonment, and torture of peaceful activists (the Damascus Spring).

The regime is a de facto continuation of the one Bashar al-Assad inherited from his father, Hafez Al-Assad. While the president himself changed, the inner circle and the “mafia” running the nation has not.

7 - Didn’t Bashar improve the nation?

Actually, he did not. The gap between rich and poor has grown exponentially in Syria over the past 10 years. By opening Syria’s protected economy to the world market, and by favoring certain members of the regime elite to engage in business deals, Bashar al-Assad has enabled the wealthy to become wealthier, while the poor have become poorer.

The president’s cousin, Rami Makhlouf, is but one example of a business tycoon who monopolized Syrian industries – most famously the cell phone industry – and who charges a 10% tax on nearly every major business contract in Syria. As such, Rami Makhlouf has earned the nickname “Mr. 10 Percent.”

Stability has not been a problem in Syria over the past 40 years as it has been at the expense of personal freedoms. The GDP in Syria is still one of the lowest in the region and three-fourths of Syrians live on less than $70 / month. The unemployment rate is as high as 20 % (exact figures are not provided by the government).

Furthermore, Syria’s national resources, such as oil and natural gas, go directly into the presidential budget, and are unaccounted for in the national budget.

8 - But didn't Bashar announce reforms to address protesters’ demands?

Bashar’s announcements have been purely symbolic and designed to appease the masses. The so-called reforms have not led to any tangible or meaningful change in the Syrian society.

For example, in April 2011, the decades-old Emergency Law was repealed as an empty concession to the ongoing protests. This law was never the problem in itself; rather, the problem is that the regime is above the law. The invasiveness of the security forces into every aspect of life, with or without emergency laws, has only fueled the problem.

Bashar even “decreed” in August 2011 a multi-party system. This is also a farce: How can a multi-party system exist when Article 8 in the Syrian Constitution guarantees the Ba’ath Party as “protectors of the nation”?

With every announcement that Bashar makes, we see his so-called “reform” in action as protesters are shot in the streets for calling for change.

9 - Will the regime fall?

Absolutely – Syria has reached a tipping point, with large segments of the Syrian population supporting change – there are major protests in every city, every day.

The regime will fall – it is just a matter of when, and how many more people will be killed in the process.

The regime has so much blood on its hands that it is past the point of return – almost every family in Syria has had a family member killed, tortured, or imprisoned. It is personal for people.

10 - Why will the regime fall?

The brutality we have seen has only strengthened the resolve of the Syrian masses – with every Syrian who is tortured, detained, or murdered, more people who may have been “on the fence” realize that the regime has lost legitimacy, and is no longer in a sustainable position.

Also, the momentum of the Arab streets is substantial – after witnessing the fall of dictators such as Ben Ali, Mubarak, and Gaddhafi, the Syrian people understand that this may be their only chance for a better life.

11 - How will the regime fall?

Many scenarios are plausible, with a combination of the following resulting in a situation where the regime can no longer survive:
  • In-fighting within the regime, among the brothers, as we saw in the mid-80s between Hafez al-Assad and his brother Rifaat. Ultimately, Rifaat was exiled from Syria.
  • Bankruptcy of the Syrian economy (currently on a lifeline from Iran) – the economy has been at a standstill since the protests began.
  • Divisions within the army – defections are increasing daily, and it is only a matter of time before a “free Syrian army” is mobilized.
  • Continued peaceful civil disobedience further keeps the nation in paralysis, ensuring that the regime can no longer govern.
  • Foreign international pressure, both economic and diplomatic, which is slowly tightening the noose around the regime’s neck.
Please note, most Syrians living in Syria, as well as their expatriate counterparts, have been opposed to foreign military intervention.

12 - But wait, aren't there many Syrians who are pro-regime? We saw the protests!

While there is a diverse set of opinions in Syria, the pro-regime rallies (aka the “minhibak” or “we love you” rallies) have been orchestrated directly by the regime.
  • They always take place on workdays so that government workers and students can be pressured to attend. For government workers, it’s a day out of the office; for students it’s an opportunity to get out of class.  Often, these rallies are compulsory, where government workers and students are not permitted to miss them.
  • They are always choreographed with flags and celebrities, despite being publicized as spontaneous.
Finally, there are no attacks on “mnhibik” rallies from the so-called Salafists, infiltrators, armed gangs, or foreign agents accused of being behind the protest movement – if there were, how many would still protest?

Although there are pro-regime elements within Syrian society, the overwhelming majority of Syrians have made their voices clear. They have demanded an alternative to the ruling regime. The Syrian people have spoken.

13 - Who makes up the Syrian opposition?

The opposition is extremely diverse. For more than 40 years, being vocally opposed to the Syrian regime has not been an option. Naturally, this has led to a political vacuum in Syria, which is now being filled by:
  • Youth activists, who are the backbone of the revolution and who organize communities into local and national committees.
  • Syrian intellectuals and members of banned parties within and outside Syria who have long demanded democratization but have been crushed in the past.
  • Syrian artists, including actors, political cartoonists, and singers, who have high profiles in Syrian society, yet are being treated violently by the regime.
  • Syrian expatriates, who had to leave their home country for a variety of reasons – political, financial, or other.
  • Religious figures from different sects (e.g., Sunni and Alawi leaders) who have refused to “worship” the president.
  • Others who have worked with and benefited from the Syrian regime in the past, but who lost their privileges. These people left to live abroad and now are eager to return to Syria. These individuals (e.g., Rifaat Al-Assad, Abdul Halim Khaddam) have been marginalized by the Syrian people, and are not taken seriously in any circles.
14 - Why isn't the opposition united?

Much has been made of the lack of an organized and united opposition, whether within Syria or abroad. This has been a major success for the regime. Brutality pays: over the past 40 years, through massacres, human rights violations, the culture of fear, sectarian divisions, and military and political impotency, virtually no institutions that could have been used as a means of opposing the regime have been left intact.

With this reality, this explains why at the outset of the uprising, the organized opposition inside Syria was weak, and externally not very cohesive.

However, despite the systematic assault on activists and community leaders across Syria (estimates are that one activist disappears every hour), the opposition and decentralized protest movement is maturing into a well-connected network of organizers, activists, and community leaders. All are preparing for the inevitable collapse of the Assad regime by electing local representatives and connecting them nationally and internationally, and formalizing political platforms.

15 - Is the opposition cozying up to anti-Arab, anti-Syrian elements in the west?

The Syrian opposition is very diverse. As with any fragmented network, many opportunists have jumped on board without keeping in mind the best interests of the revolution.

It is critical to note that the Syrian people will not accept an externally-fabricated opposition that does not reflect the aspirations of the Syrian people. A classic example is Farid Ghadry (the Syrian Chalabi), based in Washington, DC who has previously appeared before Israel's Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee to address interests in Syria. He has been summarily rejected within opposition circles.

In addition, the Syrian people will not accept former agents of the regime, who have now switched sides. Perfect examples of this are Abdul Halim Khaddam and Rifaat al-Assad, who had at some point been as brutal to the Syrian people as the regime itself.

There are also examples of human rights advocates speaking at Zionist organizations. While it is impossible to monitor every individual statement, these people do not represent the movement itself, and the general consensus is that Syrians oppose these sort of engagements.

16 - Is the opposition serving a foreign agenda?

The opposition started from within Syria for political, humanitarian, and socio-economic reasons, and will remain centered in Syria. Syrian expatriates are providing as much financial, political, and moral support as possible to the peaceful movement; however, the revolution remains grounded in serving one priority: the average Syrian citizen’s agenda.

17 - Does the opposition have a plan for “What’s Next”?

Rebuilding the nation after 40 years of systematic destruction of all civil society in Syria is no easy task. There is a lot of work to be done; the goal is to implement a practical foundation behind which Syrians of all backgrounds can rally.

The opposition has matured and become much more organized, holding conferences in cities such as Ankara, Istanbul, Paris, and Brussels. These opposition groups are already connecting with groups within Syria and laying the foundation for the “day after” the inevitable fall of the Assad regime.

18 - But who will lead Syria if the regime falls?

There are thousands of activists and community leaders who are willing to unite and lead their nation forward.

Despite the systematic assault on activists and community leaders across Syria (estimates are that one activist disappears every hour), the opposition and decentralized protest movement is maturing into a well-connected network of organizers, activists, and community leaders. All are preparing for the inevitable collapse of the Assad regime by electing local representatives and connecting them nationally and internationally, and formalizing political platforms.

Many have raised the concern that no key personalities are known entities – while this is true, the future stability of Syria will no longer need to depend on the cult of personality that has been dominant over the last 40 years of Assad rule.

19 - But the regime says these people are foreign infiltrators?

In a country that has been ruled by an extremely harsh dictatorship for 40 years, it is ludicrous to presume that foreign infiltrators would be able to spring up overnight and continue to have a presence in Syria for months on end.

The only evidence of foreign infiltrators has been that of Hezbollah and Iranian snipers and guards, who have assassinated peaceful demonstrators and trained regime security forces to continue their brutality against a peaceful civilian population.

20 - Isn’t Bashar providing security & defending Syria against violence by armed gangs”?

In a nation that has been ruled by a harsh dictatorship for more than 40 years, it is absurd to presume that armed gangs have suddenly appeared in every town, village, and city across the country.

The only evidence of armed gangs has been that of pro-regime “Shabiha” (the regime’s armed thugs and death squads) who have brutalized the population at the orders of the regime.

21 - But the regime says these protests are religious fanatics, Salafists?

It is clear that the protest movement represents every corner of Syria – from Lattakia on the coast, to Deir Ezzor near the Iraqi border, to Damascus. To claim that these millions are religious fanatics is not only ludicrous, but also a gross distortion of reality.

For one, there is no organized religious opposition in Syria, as it was effectively wiped out by Hafez Al-Assad in the 1980s. Even the word “Salafi” was only introduced into Syrian discourse by the regime within the last 6 months.

In addition, one of the main chants throughout Syria has been “Alshaab Alsoory wahid” or “The Syrian people are one!” – that doesn’t sound like fanaticism, does it?

The regime has tried to play this card for a few reasons:
  • To convince the population that only the current regime can ensure stability.
  • To play on the fears of sectarian strife, which run deep in the minds of many Syrians, given the history of brutal minority rule and the civil wars in Lebanon and Iraq.
  • To scare religious minority groups (e.g., Christians and Druze) into continued submission.
  • To prey on Western fears of Islamic fundamentalist penetration.
22 - Who says the protesters are peaceful?

While a small number of protesters may have resorted to violence, there is no organized armed resistance. In cases of violence, it is mostly in response to security force / Shabiha attacks, but even then, they are a small minority of those involved in the uprising.

The few of those who have resorted to violence have largely used Molotov cocktails, stones, and hunting rifles, which are no match for the full military power of Syrian forces, including tanks and helicopter gunships.

Army defectors have repeatedly confirmed that they were ordered to fire on unarmed protesters. These are the terrorists and armed gangs to which the regime refers to.

23 - Who is killing the brave Syrian soldiers?

There are very few documented accounts of Syrian security personnel being killed by protesters; however, there are numerous eyewitness reports from military defectors recounting situations in which soldiers who defected or refused to take up arms were shot by officers or fellow soldiers.

24 - But the regime says the revolution will benefit Syria’s “enemies”?

This regime is the enemy of Syria, and for decades has compromised the national ideals and aspirations of the Syrian people.

For example, more bullets have been fired at Syrian protesters on any single day since the uprising began than on the Golan front over the past 40 years.

The Assad regime has gladly collaborated with the US to support the War on Terror. Even Rami Makhlouf, Bashar al-Assad’s cousin, recently stated, “If there is no stability here, there’s no way there will be stability in Israel.”

It is time for the Syrian people to control their own destiny by building a strong nation that protects the nation, not the interests of the regime.

25 - But isn't this fabricated by the media? This is all blown out of proportion!

With very little access by international press (as it has been restricted by the regime to enter the country) the people have become citizen-journalists documenting the atrocities, protests, and funerals across the nation.

If this is blown out of proportion and all footage is skewed, one must ask, why is the regime not allowing foreign press into the country? Or, why doesn’t the regime allow UN observers to freely move around the country?

26 - But won't the revolution will destroy the economy?

The Syrian economy has been at a standstill; however, the nation’s economy has been manipulated for the personal benefit of the regime, specifically, the Assad family for generations.

The gap between rich and poor has grown exponentially in Syria over the past 10 years. By opening Syria’s protected economy to the world market, and by favoring certain members of the regime elite to engage in business deals, Bashar Al-Assad has enabled the wealthy to become wealthier, while the poor have become poorer.

The GDP in Syria is still one of the lowest in the region and three-fourths of Syrians survive on less than $70 / month. The unemployment rate is as high as 20% (exact figures are not provided by the government).

Furthermore, Syria’s national resources, such as oil and natural gas, go directly into the presidential budget, and are unaccounted for in the national budget.

One of the goals of the revolution is to ensure that the wealth of the nation is directly invested into the country, and not into the pockets of the regime.

27 - What about sectarianism? Minority rights?

Everyone in Syria has suffered at the hands of the regime, whether Sunni, Christian, Alawi, Druze, Kurd, Circassian, or any of the other ethnicities which make up the Syrian cultural fabric. This is the shared experience of the Syrian people under the Assad rule.

The issue in Syria is not about minority rights; rather, it is about basic human rights and equality for all, regardless of sect or ethnicity.

This is what is meant when protesters chant “Alshaab alsoory wahid” “The Syrian people are one!”

Furthermore, the regime is desperately trying to instigate sectarian responses by using sectarian tactics:
  • Alawite-dominated military units (Republican Guard, Maher Al-Assad’s 4th Brigade) and militias and gangs (Shabiha) have been responsible for most of the killings.
  • These groups are aiming to provoke Sunnis across the nation by attacking religious institutions, burning Korans, and targeting religious leaders.
28 - Won’t this revolution lead to a civil war?

This revolution will hopefully not lead to civil war, especially if the regime fails in its attempt to divide the Syrian society. Sectarian strife is being promoted by the regime to create chaos in order to justify its existence.

Bashar Al-Assad has already indicated that if the regime is forced out, they will burn the nation. However, as many in Syria have stated, the revolution must succeed, as the alternative to a new Syria will be too terrible to imagine.

29 - But doesn’t the Assad regime defend the causes of the Arab people?

The Assad regime has perpetuated a myth of resistance since it took over Syria. They have, for a long time, aligned their public narrative with the desires of the people, hence creating the illusion, both internally and across the Arab world, that they are brave protectors of Arab ideals.

Their narrative, however, couldn’t be further from the truth. For example, more bullets have been fired at Syrian protesters on any single day since the uprising began in March 2011 than on the Golan front over the past 40 years.

The Assad regime has gladly collaborated with the US to support the War on Terror. Even Rami Makhlouf, Bashar al-Assad’s cousin, recently stated, “If there is no stability here, there’s no way there will be stability in Israel.”

Lebanese and Palestinian people have also been longtime targets of the regime; more Lebanese have been killed in the past 20 years by Syrians than by Israelis. Moreover, as confirmed by UNRWA, thousands of Palestinian refugees fled their camps in the city of Lattakia due to regime bombardment in August 2011.

It is about self-preservation for the regime – if you are a threat to their control you will be dealt with accordingly.

30 - What role does the international community play?

The international community has an obligation to support the people of Syria in their time of need through political and economic isolation of the regime. Specifically the following five actions are required:
  1. Declare Bashar Al-Assad’s regime illegitimate and call for him to step down.
  2. Impose further sanctions on the regime and the industrial sectors propping up the regime (e.g., oil and gas).
  3. Exert pressure through the United Nations to isolate the regime (e.g., UN Security Council resolution; referral to the International Criminal Court).
  4. Pressure Turkey, Lebanon, and Jordan to declare Syrians seeking refuge as refugees, not visitors, to enable UN access to provide protection and assistance.
  5. Showcase solidarity with the pro-democracy movement by severing or minimizing diplomatic relations with the Assad regime.
31 - What role should the UN play?
  
The UN has a very specific role to play, and should focus on:
  • Adopting a UNSC resolution declaring the Assad regime illegitimate.
  •  Pushing for the temporary suspension of all Syrian activities in the UN.
  •  Pressuring the UNSC to refer regime leaders to the International Criminal Court.
  •  Assigning a special representative of the Secretary-General to go to Syria, act as a monitor, and report back to UN until the crisis is over.
  •  Leveraging the full resources of UN humanitarian response to support Syrian refugees.
32 - Why is Syria important to the US?

Syria is essential for most US foreign policy goals in the Middle East: Syria is a key influencer in ensuring stability in Iraq; is at the core of both Iran’s and Turkey’s regional policy; is still in a state of war with Israel; and it is a major stakeholder in Lebanon’s political landscape.

A democratic Syria will without a doubt be of interest to the US, especially if the Syrian people view the US as a friend in their time of need rather than a nation that stood on the sidelines while Syrians bravely demanded their freedom from a ruthless regime.

Saturday, August 13, 2011

Congressional Outreach Campaign Launching Across US

The US has not clearly demonstrated a clear strategy aimed at supporting the aspirations of the Syrian people. It is time to let them know that this is unacceptable. Their silence is killing us.

There have been many adhoc outreach efforts aimed at raising awareness among congressional reps (in the Senate & House) as to the events unfolding in Syria. There has not been however, a national campaign aimed at mobilizing the Syrian-American community and allies across the nation to push a consistent narrative with them. 


The result of which has led to a tops-down, fragmented engagement with elected officials, that has enabled neo-conservatives and regime apologists to drive the narrative of what the US role should be in support for the revolution.

Therefore, while congressmen/ women are back in their home states for the month of August we are launching a national effort to ensure all of them receive policy points on how US should engage Syria.

Every single one of you has a role to play in this campaign! Please see below for immediate steps:

  1. Our Policy on what the US role should be: Please download our Policy Brief to familiarize yourself with the 5 key points (also points can be found here)
  2. Call your elected rep and let them know that you, as a concerned citizen, want the US to take a role in support of the revolution.
    • Note: Every elected rep will be receiving this same packet from us over the next few days (by email/ mail). Make sure to reiterate the 5 points in the policy paper to them
  3. Meet with your representative. All elected officials will be back in their home states during the month of August - make sure you meet with them to educate them on whats happening in Syria. Here is a guide on how to setup these meetings. Please also send us an email so we can connect you with others in your district to join you in these meetings
  4. Share this with EVERYONE! We need to ensure that EVERY elected rep hears from all of us, and that it CRYSTAL CLEAR to them what the US role should be
Let us reclaim our narrative from those who wish to use the revolution for their own purposes. No more silence. The revolution must, and will succeed.

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

5 Actions the US Should Take in Support of the Syrian Revolution


The US has been painfully slow in clearly demonstrating a strategy aimed at supporting the pro-democracy aspirations of the Syrian people. It is now time to put forth the strongest condemnation possible, and align with the pro-democracy movement in Syria.

  1. Unequivocally, declare Bashar Al-Assad’s regime illegitimate and call for him to step down.

    1. It is time for the US to take a firm stance and not wordsmith responses of condemnation while leaving the door open for ‘reform’
    2. The Syrian people will not accept anything but the removal of the regime, and the opposition is maturing and will emerge to lead the nation ‘the day after’ Assad falls

  1. Further sanction the regime, and the industries propping them up
    1. We applaud the expanded list of targeted sanctions on members of the regime, however Syrian oil needs to be embargoed as ~1/3 of the regime’s budget is derived from this sector and is funding the military and security apparatus
§  Building on this, the US will need to pressure European consumers of Syrian oil to slash consumption of Syrian oil – while this will not make a major impact in the worlds oil market, it will severely restrict the regimes ability to fund the onslaught

  1. Exert pressure through the United Nations to isolate the regime
    1. Push for the temporary suspension of Syrian activity in the UN
    2. Pressure Security Council to refer Regime leaders to the International Criminal Court
    3. Assign a special representative of the Secretary-General to go to Syria, act as a monitor and report-back to UN

  1. Pressure Turkey and Lebanon to declare Syrian seeking refuge as refugees, not “visitors” to enable UN access to provide protection and assistance
    1. The Syrian refugees in Turkey and Lebanon have been isolated from the UN/NGOs and the rest of the world. They are currently suffering as the Turks are sequestering them in the hopes that other refugees will not cross the border. In Lebanon, there are reports that some Lebanese factions are deporting  refugees back to Syria. As the regime becomes more desperate and more refugees cross the border, this is turning into a humanitarian disaster

  1. Showcase solidarity with pro-democracy movement by cutting or reducing diplomatic relations
    1. Take the lead by immediately expelling the Syrian Ambassador, and pressuring allies to do the same around the world
    2. Coordinate the withdrawal of foreign ambassadors from Syria while keeping a skeleton diplomatic presence to ensure monitoring and further reiterate the world’s rejection of the Assad regime
    3. Urge for opening the country before international media

In conclusion

The Syrian people are NOT asking for military intervention. Rather, they are asking for the US to stand by the values it preaches and to support the aspirations of the people by isolating the regime, politically, diplomatically and economically.
What the Syrian people are urging the US to do is to stand on the side of history. For the Syrian regime will fall - sooner rather than later. But the Syrian blood, shed today with US acquiescence will NOT be recovered. Nor it will be forgotten. Rather, it will stay unforgivable and haunting.